« Text Message is a "verbal" Communication in Criminal Statute | Main | Fit for a Bar but not a Church »

February 9, 2008

Tid Bits

Interesting Sovereign Immunity Case from Ninth Circuit. In an era privatizing government function, this Ninth Circuit California case is both interesting and thoughtful. There's an article here.

Don't Cry for me Habeas Corpus. The First Circuit has upheld the limitations placed on habeas by statute against constitutional challenge in a case you can read here. The opinion states: "Petitioner's arguments are based not so much on the statutory text of § 2254(d) as on the Supreme Court's binding interpretation of that text in Williams v. Taylor as to the meaning of three key terms in the statute: "clearly established," "contrary to," and "unreasonable application.""

February 9, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5503d8b168834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tid Bits:

Comments

Post a comment