Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Couture on the First Amendment and Securities Fraud

The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities Fraud, by Wendy Gerwick Couture, University of Idaho College of Law, was recently posted on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

This Article seeks to correct the imbalance that occurs when the First Amendment and securities fraud collide. Under current precedent, securities analysts, credit rating agencies, and financial journalists are subject to differing liability standards; depending on whether they are sued for defamation or for securities fraud. Under New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 279-80 (1964), First Amendment protections apply in the defamation context in order to prevent the chilling of valuable speech, yet courts have declined to extend these protections to the securities fraud context. This imbalance threatens to chill valuable speech about public companies. To prevent the dangerous chilling effect of potential securities fraud liability, this Article contends that the New York Times protections should apply equally in securities fraud cases. Therefore, under this Article’s recommendation, a securities fraud claim asserted against a non-commercial speaker for speech concerning a public company cannot prevail absent a showing of actual malice, by clear and convincing evidence, and subject to independent appellate review.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2013/06/couture-on-the-first-amendment-and-securities-fraud.html

Law Review Articles | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0191031ccbda970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Couture on the First Amendment and Securities Fraud:

Comments

Post a comment