Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Strine et alia on Putting Stockholders First

Putting Stockholders First, Not the First-Filed Complaint, by Leo E. Strine Jr., Government of the State of Delaware - Court of Chancery; Lawrence A. Hamermesh, Widener University School of Law; Matthew Jennejohn, Shearman & Sterling LLP, was recently posted on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

The prevalence of settlements in class and derivative litigation challenging mergers and acquisitions in which the only payment is to plaintiffs’ attorneys suggests potential systemic dysfunction arising from the increased frequency of parallel litigation in multiple state courts. After examining possible explanations for that dysfunction, and the historical development of doctrines limiting parallel state court litigation — the doctrine of forum non conveniens and the “first-filed” doctrine — this article suggests that those doctrines should be revised to better address shareholder class and derivative litigation. Revisions to the doctrine of forum non conveniens should continue the historical trend, deemphasizing fortuitous and increasingly irrelevant geographic considerations, and should place greater emphasis on voluntary choice of law and the development of precedential guidance by the courts of the state responsible for supplying the chosen law. The “first-filed” rule should be replaced in shareholder representative litigation by meaningful consideration of affected parties’ interests and judicial efficiency.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2013/01/strine-et-alia-on-putting-stockholders-first.html

Law Review Articles | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee7b3360f970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Strine et alia on Putting Stockholders First:

Comments

Post a comment