Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Colorado Federal District Court Refuses to Approve SEC Settlement

A federal district court judge for the District of Colorado has refused to approve a proposed SEC settlement.  In a terse order that does not describe the SEC's allegations against defendants Bridge Premium Finance LLC et al., Judge John L. Kane stated that he "refuse[d] to approve penalties against a defendant who remains defiantly mute as to the veracity of the allegations against him.  A defendant's options in this regard are binary: he may admit the allegations or he may go to trial."  In addition, the judge objected to the language in the consents and the proposed final judgments in which the defendants waived their rights to the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law and their rights to appeal, because "[t]hese findings are important to inform the public and the appellate courts."  SEC v. Bridge Premium Finance LLC (D. Col. Jan. 17, 2013, Case No. 1:12-cv-02131-JLK-BNB)

The Second Circuit will hear the SEC and Citigroup's appeal from Judge Rakoff's refusal to approve their proposed settlement on February 8.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2013/01/colorado-federal-district-court-refuses-to-approve-sec-settlement.html

Judicial Opinions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee7c9ac15970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Colorado Federal District Court Refuses to Approve SEC Settlement:

Comments

Post a comment