Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

SEC Charges Florida Attorney with $27.5 Million Investment Fraud

The SEC charged an attorney and two others living in South Florida for their roles in a $27.5 million investment scheme that led investors to believe they were purchasing securities consisting of “pre-sold” commodities contracts with a pre-determined profit. However, the supposed profits actually distributed to investors were largely taken from other investors’ funds.

The SEC halted the scheme last year when it obtained an asset freeze and a court-appointed receiver over the companies involved: Commodities Online LLC and Commodities Online Management LLC. The SEC’s follow-up charges are against the founder and former president of the company, James C. Howard III, as well as the company’s vice president Louis N. Gallo III and outside counsel Michael R. Casey, who later became the president.

In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida today announced criminal charges against Howard, Gallo, and Casey.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Commodities Online offered investors the chance to participate in its purportedly profitable brokering of physical commodities via pre-sold contracts – for example, the purchase and sale of large amounts of seafood or iron ore. Investors were sold participation units in unregistered private placement offerings, each supposedly tied to a commodities transaction in which Commodities Online had already secured a buyer and a seller of the commodity. These participation units would purportedly generate predetermined profits for investors.

The SEC alleges that in reality, Commodities Online performed only a limited percentage of the commodities transactions that were promised to investors. The majority of “profits” allocated or distributed to investors were not profits from completed commodities transactions, but instead taken from the funds of other investors. Meanwhile, Howard and Gallo were dissipating millions of dollars in investor funds to largely sham companies. Through these companies, Howard and Gallo stole investor funds for their own use.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Howard stepped down as the company’s president in 2010 after he was arrested for an unrelated investment fraud. He was replaced by Casey, who misled investors about Howard’s continuing control over Commodities Online while also misrepresenting the profitability, structure, and existence of the purported commodities contracts to investors. Casey also failed to tell at least one investor that the funds raised from the purchase of membership interests had previously been misappropriated by Howard.

The SEC alleges that Gallo ran an in-house “boiler room” of telephone sales agents and a network of approximately 20 regional and international sales offices. He failed to disclose to investors that he previously pled guilty to federal bank fraud and other felonies and was serving a term of supervised release while employed at Commodities Online. Gallo also misled investors about Howard’s role at Commodities Online.

The SEC is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, financial penalties, and permanent injunctions against Howard, Gallo, and Casey. The SEC’s complaint also names several relief defendants for the purposes of recovering investor money steered to those entities in the scheme: Sutton Capital LLC, J&W Trading LLC, American Financial Solutions LLC, and Minjo Corporation.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2012/09/sec-charges-florida-attorney-with-275-million-investment-fraud.html

SEC Action | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017d3bda0b36970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SEC Charges Florida Attorney with $27.5 Million Investment Fraud:

Comments

I have observed that most people who committed fraudulent acts actually have a record of certain crimes in the past or a failed investment in dealings with another fraud case. What I don't understand is why they keep on committing these crimes when in fact they already have a record for which they can be monitored easily. A bad move for them.

Posted by: Jose Pare | Sep 19, 2012 7:34:11 AM

Post a comment