Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, September 14, 2012

NYSE Settles SEC Charges for Improper Distribution of Market Data

The SEC brought charges against the New York Stock Exchange for compliance failures that gave certain customers an improper head start on trading information.  NYSE and its parent company NYSE Euronext agreed to a $5 million penalty and undertakings to settle the SEC's charges. It marks the first-ever SEC financial penalty against an exchange.

SEC Regulation NMS (National Market System) prohibits the practice of improperly sending market data to proprietary customers before sending that data to be included in consolidated feeds which broadly distribute trade and quote data to the public. According to the SEC's order against NYSE, the exchange violated this rule over an extended period of time beginning in 2008 by sending data through two of its proprietary feeds before sending data to the consolidated feeds. NYSE's inadequate compliance efforts failed to monitor the speed of its proprietary feeds compared to its data transmission to the consolidated feeds.

The two NYSE proprietary data feeds at issue were Open Book Ultra — which sends real-time data about NYSE's entire order book — and PDP Quotes, which contains NYSE's quote for each security. The transmission disparities had several causes. An internal NYSE system architecture gave one of the data feeds a faster path to customers than the path used to send data to the consolidated feed. Also there was a software issue in the internal NYSE system that sent data to the consolidated feed. The disparities in data release times ranged from single-digit milliseconds to multiple seconds.

The SEC's order finds that NYSE's compliance department was not involved in important technology decisions, including the design, implementation, and operation of NYSE's market data systems. By not involving the compliance department at critical junctures, NYSE missed opportunities to avoid compliance failures. NYSE also failed to retain computer files that contained information about its transmission of market data, including the times that NYSE sent data to be included in the consolidated feed. These computer files related to NYSE's compliance with Rule 603(a), and NYSE's failure to retain them complicated its ability to determine when it experienced delays sending data and calculate the length of delays when they occurred.

NYSE and NYSE Euronext agreed to a settlement without admitting or denying the Commission's findings. The order censures NYSE, imposes a $5 million penalty, and requires both NYSE and NYSE Euronext to cease and desist from committing or causing these violations. NYSE and NYSE Euronext are required to retain an independent consultant to conduct a comprehensive review of their market data delivery systems to ensure that they comply with Rule 603(a).

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2012/09/nyse-settles-sec-charges-for-improper-distribution-of-market-data.html

SEC Action | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017744b9dd1e970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NYSE Settles SEC Charges for Improper Distribution of Market Data:

Comments

Why weren't they penalized the full value of the revenue they realized by selling the faster pricing feed? Open Book Ultra costs $60,000 per customer per year, and there must have been at least 1,000 customers, implying the SEC fine amounted to less than 5% of the total revenue they generated from selling the faster prices.

Posted by: Jesse Livermore | Sep 14, 2012 11:24:22 AM

Post a comment