Sunday, March 11, 2012
Regulatory Effectiveness in Onshore & Offshore Financial Centers, by Andrew P. Morriss, University of Alabama School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center; George Mason University - Mercatus Center, and Clifford Chad Henson, University of Illinois College of Law; University of Illinois, College of Business, Department of Finance, was recently posted on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Onshore jurisdictions, such as the United States, United Kingdom, France and Germany, are critical of offshore financial centers (OFCs), such as Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, and the Channel Islands. Arguments against OFCs include claims that their regulatory oversight is lax, allowing fraud and criminal activity. In this article, we present cross-jurisdictional data, showing that OFCs are not lax. We also provide qualitative analyses of regulatory effectiveness, demonstrating that input-based measures of regulation are inappropriate metrics for comparing jurisdictions. Based on both quantitative input measures and a qualitative assessment, we reject the onshore critique of OFCs as bastions of laxity.