Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Another Court Significantly Reduces Madoff Trustee's Claims Against Banks

Judge McMahon (S.D.N.Y.) ruled  on November 1 that Madoff Trustee Picard did not have standing to pursue common law claims against JPMorganChase andd UBS to recover on behalf of the defrauded customers, based on allegations that the banks knew, should have known or consciously avoided discovering, that Madoff' was illegally misappropriating customers' funds.  Picard v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., Picard v. UBS AG (No. 11 civ. 913 (CM)Download Picard.JP Morgan. ( She thus joins Judge Rakoff (also S.D.N.Y.), who recently ruled similarly in Picard v. HSBC Bank PLC, 454 B.R. 25, in holding that the Trustee's authority under the Bankruptcy Code and SIPA extends only to recovering funds on behalf of the brokerage firm.  Accordingly, the amount of money the Trustee can recover from the banks is significantly reduced.

Judge McMahon held that:

  • There was no doubt that the common law causes of action belong to the creditors, not the brokerage firm; and
  • The Trustee cannot pursue the common law causes of action on behalf of the brokerage firm as a consequence of the equitable doctrine of in pari delicto.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2011/11/another-court-significantly-reduces-madoff-trustees-claims-against-banks.html

Judicial Opinions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0162fc18b1cd970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Another Court Significantly Reduces Madoff Trustee's Claims Against Banks:

Comments

Post a comment