Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Carney et al. on Dominance of Delaware Corporate Law

Lawyers, Ignorance, and the Dominance of Delaware Corporate Law, by William J. Carney, Emory University School of Law; George B. Shepherd, Emory University School of Law; and Joanna Shepherd, Emory University School of Law, was recently posted on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:


Why does Delaware continue to dominate the market for incorporations even though recent research has shown that the quality of Delaware corporate law has declined substantially? We focus on the rational ignorance of lawyers and investors. Using the results of our survey of lawyers involved in initial public offerings (IPOs) as well as our analysis of companies involved in IPOs, we conclude that lawyers recommend Delaware because they are ignorant about other states’ law. Because Delaware is so dominant, law schools focus on Delaware corporate law, and a lawyer rationally learns the corporate law only of Delaware and her home state. Regardless of the quality of the law of other states, lawyers will not recommend it because they are unfamiliar with it. Likewise, lawyers recommend only Delaware law because they believe that investors are ignorant of other states’ law.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2011/10/carney-et-al-on-dominance-of-delaware-corporate-law.html

Law Review Articles | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef015392af888a970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Carney et al. on Dominance of Delaware Corporate Law:

Comments

Post a comment