Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Steinberg & Kirby on Section 11

The Assault on Section 11 of the Securities Act: A Study in Judicial Activism, by Marc I. Steinberg, Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law, and Brent A. Kirby, was recently posted on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

This article focuses on the federal courts' restrictive interpretation of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, the most investor-friendly express remedy that the "New Deal" Congress enacted. This judicial erosion has resulted in a cause of action that extends to fewer investors and is riddled with uncertainty at the pleading stage. The authors posit that recent federal court decisions that have added reliance as an element of Section 11 claims and rejected the use of statistical evidence to prove tracing are inconsistent with Section 11's text and legislative history. The article then explores the inconsistencies associated with pleading Section 11 claims that "sound in fraud" by asserting that these claims should be extended the longer statute of limitations available to such fraud-based claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The authors conclude that the federal courts' focus on impeding vexatious litigation has resulted in unduly restrictive judicial interpretations that have altered the very nature of Section 11.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2011/04/steinberg-kirby-on-section-11-.html

Law Review Articles | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef014e880c1114970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Steinberg & Kirby on Section 11 :

Comments

Post a comment