February 20, 2011
Palmiter & Taha on Mutual Fund Performance Advertising
Mutual Fund Performance Advertising: Inherently and Materially Misleading?, by Alan R. Palmiter, Wake Forest University - School of Law, and Ahmed Taha, Wake Forest University - School of Law, was recently posted on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
Mutual fund companies routinely advertise the past returns of their strong-performing, actively-managed equity funds. These performance advertisements imply that the advertised high past returns are likely to continue. Indeed, investors flock to these funds despite high past returns being a poor predictor of high future returns. Thus, fund performance advertising is inherently and materially misleading and violates federal securities antifraud standards. In addition, the SEC-mandated warning in these advertisements that “past performance does not guarantee future results” fails to temper investors’ focus on past returns.
The SEC should do more to prevent investors from being misled by fund performance advertisements. It should at least require a stronger warning that makes clear that high returns by actively-managed mutual funds generally do not persist. The SEC should also seriously consider reinstating its prior prohibition of performance advertisements. Such a ban would help investors focus on more important fund characteristics, such a fund’s costs, risk, and the extent to which the fund’s investment objective matches that of the investor.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Palmiter & Taha on Mutual Fund Performance Advertising: