Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, November 15, 2010

Law Profs File Amicus Brief in Case Addressing Definition of Materiality

In January the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. Siracusano, a securities fraud action that addresses again the definition of materiality under Rule 10b-5.  The issue is whether the application of a test of statistical significance to adverse event reports for widely distributed drugs will result in a bright-line test for materiality that is inconsistent with the Northway/Basic test.  Recently a group of law professors, spearheaded by Jay Brown (Denver), filed an amicus curiae brief (Download Matrixx09-1156 bsac Professors at Law) in support of respondents, as did the United States (Download MatrixxAmicus_Pltfs_SG_SEC.

The Ninth Circuit's opinion, reversing the district court's dismissal of investors' claim, is reported at 585 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2009).

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2010/11/law-profs-file-amicus-brief-in-case-addressing-definition-of-materiality-.html

Judicial Opinions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef013488feeff8970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Law Profs File Amicus Brief in Case Addressing Definition of Materiality :

Comments

Post a comment