Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, April 5, 2010

SEC's Inspector General Critical of Agency's Whistle-Blower Bounty Program

The SEC's Office of Inspector General recently completed an Assessment of the SEC’s Bounty Program.  Here is an excerpt from the summary:

Although the SEC has had a bounty program in-place for more than 20 years for rewarding whistleblowers for insider trading tips and complaints, our review found that there have been very few payments made under this program. Likewise, the Commission has not received a large number of applications from individuals seeking a bounty over this 20-year period. We also found that the program is not widely recognized inside or outside the Commission. Additionally, while the Commission recently asked for expanded authority from Congress to reward whistleblowers who bring forward substantial evidence about other significant federal securities law violations, we found that the current SEC bounty program is not fundamentally well-designed to be successful.

More specifically, we found that improvements are needed to the bounty application process to make it more user-friendly and help ensure that bounty applications provide detailed information regarding the alleged securities law violations. We also found that the criteria for judging bounty applications are broad and the SEC has not put in place internal policies and procedures to assist staff in assessing contributions made by whistleblowers and making bounty award determinations. Additionally, we found that the Commission does not routinely provide status reports to whistleblowers regarding their bounty applications, even if a whistleblower’s information led to an investigation.  Moreover, we found that once bounty applications are received by the SEC and forwarded to appropriate staff for review and further consideration, they are not tracked to ensure they are timely and adequately reviewed. Lastly, we found that files regarding bounty referrals did not always contain complete documentation, such as a copy of the bounty application, a memorandum sent to the whistleblower to acknowledge receipt of the application, and a referral memorandum showing the office or division and official to whom the bounty application was referred for further consideration.

We wish to note that the SEC has begun to take steps to correct the deficiencies identified in its whistleblower/bounty program. The SEC has had consultations with the Department of Justice (DOJ), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and other agencies, as well as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, to identify best practices from existing well-defined whistleblower programs. The SEC has also attempted to incorporate some of these best practices into legislation which it is seeking from Congress to include expanded authority to reward whistleblowers for securities law violations. The proposed legislation also takes into account some issues identified in this report in connection with the existing insider trading
bounty program.

We believe that it is critical for the SEC to implement the following recommendations to ensure that it has a fully-functioning and successful whistleblower program in place as its authority is potentially expanded.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2010/04/secs-inspector-general-critical-of-agencys-whistleblower-bounty-program.html

SEC Action | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0133ec7ad293970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SEC's Inspector General Critical of Agency's Whistle-Blower Bounty Program:

Comments

Post a comment