Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Second Circuit Affirms Insider Trading Verdict Against Inhouse Attorney

On September 21, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a jury verdict finding Mitchell S. Drucker, an attorney and former associate general counsel at NBTY, Inc. ("NBTY"), a nutritional supplements manufacturer and retailer, and his father, Ronald Drucker, liable for violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities and affirmed the remedies imposed by the federal district court. The Court of Appeals also affirmed the District Court's order of disgorgement against relief defendant William Minerva ("Minerva").

The Commission had charged that, while Mitchell Drucker was a lawyer at NBTY, and had learned that NBTY was about to announce lower than expected quarterly earnings, he and his father, a former New York City police detective, sold their entire holdings of NBTY stock just before the negative announcement. Collectively, the defendants avoided $197,243 in losses by selling in advance of the announcement.  On December 3, 2007, a federal jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found Mitchell Drucker and Ronald Drucker violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws by committing insider trading.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2009/10/second-circuit-affirms-insider-trading-verdict-against-inhouse-attorney.html

Judicial Opinions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a5b273f7970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Second Circuit Affirms Insider Trading Verdict Against Inhouse Attorney:

Comments

Post a comment