Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, October 5, 2009

FINRA Expands Pilot Arbitration Program Giving Investors Choice of No Industry Arbitrator

FINRA announced the expansion of its two-year pilot program that gives investors who are filing eligible claims the opportunity to select an arbitration panel composed of three public arbitrators instead of two public and one non-public.  In its second year, the pilot will expand from 11 to 14 broker-dealers, and the number of eligible cases will increase from 276 to 411, a rise of nearly 50 percent. Only the investor filing the claim can elect to participate in the program and the firms cannot choose which cases are eligible.

 Each participating firm has agreed to commit a specific number of cases to the pilot. Cases enter the pilot on a first-come, first-served basis at the sole discretion of the claimant, who is typically a retail brokerage customer. The program began on October 6, 2008, and will conclude on October 5, 2010.  The three new firms contributing cases to the pilot program are: Chase Investment Services, with 10 cases; Oppenheimer & Co, with 15 cases; and Raymond James Financial Services/Raymond James & Associates, with 10 cases. Of the 11 firms already participating, five are increasing the number of pilot cases from 40 to 60: Citigroup Global Markets, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, UBS Financial Services and Wells Fargo Advisors.

 Other participating firms are Ameriprise Financial Services, with 18 cases; Charles Schwab, with 10 cases; Edward Jones, with 18 cases; Fidelity Brokerage Services, with 10 cases; LPL Financial, with 10 cases; and TD Ameritrade with 10 cases.

 The pilot program will be evaluated by a number of criteria, including the percentage of investors who opt in and, of those, the percentage who actually select an all-public panel. Currently, about half of the investors in the pilot choose to have a non-public arbitrator on their hearing panel.  FINRA also will compare the results of pilot and non-pilot cases, including the percentage of cases that settle before award and how quickly they settle, the length of hearings and the use of expert witnesses. FINRA also is conducting participant surveys.

 So far, investors have filed 474 eligible cases. With the initial year of the pilot nearly concluded, 51 percent of the eligible investors have opted into the pilot, resulting in 244 cases.  Investors who choose to have their claim heard under the pilot program — and the firm named in the claim — receive the same three lists of potential arbitrators that parties in non-pilot disputes receive: lists of eight chair-qualified public arbitrators, eight public arbitrators and eight non-public arbitrators. Investors participating in the pilot may choose either an all-public three-member panel or a majority public panel with one non-public arbitrator.

 To date, in the 225 pilot cases where ranking lists have been returned, investors have ranked one or more non-public arbitrators half the time and struck all eight non-public arbitrators in the other half. Thus, investors are choosing to have a non-public arbitrator in 50 percent of the pilot cases.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2009/10/finra-expands-pilot-arbitration-program-giving-investors-choice-of-no-industry-arbitrator.html

Other Regulatory Action | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a5c111e3970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference FINRA Expands Pilot Arbitration Program Giving Investors Choice of No Industry Arbitrator:

Comments

I am going through an absolute nightmare arbitration claim with FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Paid for by the industry, for the industry. My hearing has been delayed time and time again. We had an arbitrator who had fraudulent degrees - a MA and PhD from a degree mill. I had to PUSH to get this guy off the panel-- FINRA was going to let him stay as the chair -- and to the best of my knowledge, he is still a FINRA arbitrator and chair! so, someone else could get him next... the respondent filed a retaliatory lawsuit against me - that was dismissed and he was sanctioned - but i spent tens of thousands of dollars fighting and wasted time with it. Check out my blog, www.myfinraclaim.com to read my story. and what is wrong with mandatory arbitration clauses. and FINRA - this is the only place for relief for investors and associated persons. and it is completely industry driven and run. it's shameful... it's time for congress to take over finra and have real regulation of the financial services industry... the commercials they are running? a joke. i haven't been able to get a job in 19 months because of this - and they want me to wait another 4-6 months to get my day in court.

Posted by: Chris Wanken | Oct 14, 2009 11:37:04 AM

Post a comment