Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, June 29, 2009

Madoff Sentenced to 150 Years

Federal District Court Judge Denny Chin threw the book at Bernie Madoff today, imposing the maximum sentence of 150 years, exactly what the prosecutors asked for and what Madoff's defense attorney called as "defying reason" (he suggested 12 years).  The judge said that symbolism is important and "a message must be sent that Mr. Madoff's crimes were extraordinarily evil."  The judge also noted the long duration of the fraud.

During what all reports describe as an emotional hearing nine victims were permitted to make statements, after which Madoff made a statement.  Turning to face the people in the courtroom, he apologized and denied that he and his wife Ruth were not sympathetic to the victims:  "she cries herself to sleep every night."  (Ruth Madoff, who was not in the courtroom, released a statement that, like the victims, she felt betrayed and confused.  Ruth Madoff has reached a settlement with the SEC that will allow her to keep $2.5 million, at least until other regulators or victims seek to recover it.)

Judge Chin also observed that he sensed that Madoff has not been as cooperative as he could be (a complaint that the prosecutors and SIPC have made) and that no one had submitted letters on behalf of Madoff.

NYTimes, Madoff Is Sentenced to 150 Years for Ponzi Scheme

WSJ, Madoff Is Sentenced to 150 Years in Multibillion-Dollar Ponzi Scheme

WPost, Madoff Sentenced to Maximum 150 Years in Prison 
 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2009/06/madoff-sentenced-to-150-years.html

News Stories | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef011570945caf970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Madoff Sentenced to 150 Years:

Comments

The issues of letters in support is an interesting one. They aren't subjects of judicial notice, and wouldn't be admissible as evidence without live testimony. No meaningful effort is made to determine that they are truthful or come from actual victims, and they aren't sworn. They are very common in white collar cases, and comparatively rare in "blue collar" crime cases.

Posted by: ohwilleke | Jul 1, 2009 2:04:51 PM

Post a comment