Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Harris on Contested Corporate Elections

The Quiet Revolutionary: The Absence of Retail Investors in Contested Corporate Elections, by Lee A. Harris,  University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, was recently posted on SSRN.  Here is the abstract:

Shareholder-led campaigns to install new leadership at U.S. firms occur too rarely and, when they do occur, are led by the same boring, cast of characters too often. This Article presents empirical evidence that the system of contested corporate elections is broken. When it comes to the interests of retail investors-i.e., individuals usually with small stakes in a particular firm-the evidence suggests that contested corporate elections are virtually off-limits. Retail investors almost never launch a campaign and their interests are not represented well by those who do. This Article presents empirical evidence that the lop-sided nature of the current structure reduces the number of contested corporate elections overall, particularly those that, but for the rules, would originate from retail investors.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2009/01/harris-on-conte.html

Law Review Articles | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef010536d68eb8970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Harris on Contested Corporate Elections:

Comments

Post a comment