Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, November 5, 2007

SEC Gets Mixed Results in PIPES Short-Sales Charges

The SEC has brought a number of actions recently in which it alleges Securities Act section 5 violations for short-selling securities prior to purchasing the same securities in a PIPES offering.  Today it filed a settled action against New Jersey-based hedge fund TCMP3 Partners, L.P., its general partner TCMP3 Capital, LLC, its investment manager Titan Capital Management, LLC, and portfolio managers Walter M. Schenker and Steven E. Slawson in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The defendants agreed to settle the Commission's charge that they violated of Section 5 in connection with 26 unregistered "PIPEs" (Private Investment in Public Equity) offerings. The Commission alleges in its complaint that the defendants typically, after agreeing to invest in a PIPE offering, sold short the issuer's stock. The Commission's complaint further alleges that, once the Commission declared the resale registration statement for a PIPE effective, defendants used some or all of the PIPE shares to close out pre-effective date short positions by journaling PIPE shares to their short account.

However, a federal district court recently dismissed similar charges in SEC v. Mangan (W.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2007), holding that no sale of unregistered securities occurred as a matter of law.  The SEC has a number of similar cases pending in other jurisdictions.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2007/11/the-sec-has-bro.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54f7a9ebd8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SEC Gets Mixed Results in PIPES Short-Sales Charges:

Comments

Post a comment