Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Is There Consistency in Corporate Penalties?

The word for months was that the SEC was striving to achieve consensus and set a consistent policy in imposing penalties on corporations for violations of the federal securities laws.  This was the explanation for the long delay in finalizing settlements in the stock options backdating cases.  So, with the settlements in Mercury and Brocade, can we discern a consistent policy?  I confess that, on an initial quick glance, I do not see it.  Brocade was settled for $7 million civil penalty; the period of fraud lasted five years, and the SEC press release mentions that the company's audit committee conducted a thorough investigation when the abuses surfaced, surely a mitigating factor.  Mercury was settled for $28 million penalty.  In that case, the fraud lasted eight years, and the SEC press release emphasizes the "widespread and pernicious misconduct" in that case.  But identification of these factors does not make out a policy to account for the difference between $7 million and $28 million, to my mind.  Anyone have any additional insights?

News Stories | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is There Consistency in Corporate Penalties?:

» Inter Alia from THE LEGAL SCOOP
After some time away, Inter Alia (among other things) is back. Expect new links every few weeks. Enjoy!Over at the Securities Law Prof Blog, Barbara Black [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 4, 2007 10:52:36 AM


Post a comment