Securities Law Prof Blog

Editor: Eric C. Chaffee
Univ. of Toledo College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, March 30, 2007

Form U-5 Statements Have Absolute Privilege, New York Court Rules

The New York Court of Appeals held that brokerage firms have an absolute privilege against defamation suits with respect to statements made on the U-5 Forms filed upon termination of a broker's employment.  Previously, the law was unclear whether the privilege was absolute or qualified.  Answering a question certified to it by the 2d Circuit, New York's highest court (in a 4-2 decision) said that absolute privilege followed from the "Form U-5's compulsory nature and its role in the NASD's quasi-judicial process, together with the protection of public interests."  Rosenberg v. MetLife, 2007 WL 922920 (Mar. 29, 2007).

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/securities/2007/03/form_u5_stateme.html

Judicial Opinions | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83542aa5e53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Form U-5 Statements Have Absolute Privilege, New York Court Rules:

Comments

Post a comment