January 31, 2007
New Hampshire Superior Court Excludes Fingerprint Testimony
A New Hampshire Superior Court has provisionally excluded the testimony of a fingerprint examiner, citing the examiner's failure to maintain proper documentation and her failure to use a blind verification procedure. The opinion by Justice Coffey can be found here. (Many thanks to Simon Cole for finding the link).
January 31, 2007 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Hampshire Superior Court Excludes Fingerprint Testimony:
» Fingerprint testimony excluded. from Appellate Law
Science Law Blog points to NH v. Langill from a New Hampshire Superior Court excluding fingerprint testimony. Unfortunately, this opinion results in exclusion because of poor application of the methods, even though it seems to indicate that most method... [Read More]
Tracked on Jan 31, 2007 3:14:53 PM
The importance of accurate and thorough procedures cannot be overstated, especially when it comes to methods of identifying individuals in court. There are very good reasons for a judge to be concerned about the quality of testimony related to fingerprints, and we should be glad to have judges in NH ever-vigilant of the lack thereof.
Posted by: Robert Hunt | May 8, 2007 2:12:40 AM