Reproductive Rights Prof Blog

Editor: Caitlin E. Borgmann
CUNY School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Saturday, November 30, 2013

The Establishment Clause and the Contraception Mandate Cases

Balkinization: The Establishment Clause and the Contraception Mandate, by Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe:

Yesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius, which ask whether large, for-profit corporations and their religious owners can assert rights of religious free exercise under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and, if so, whether their rights are violated by the government’s requirement that they pay for health insurance that includes coverage for various forms of contraception. . . .

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/reproductive_rights/2013/11/the-contraception-mandate-litigation-1.html

Contraception, In the Courts, Religion and Reproductive Rights | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef019b01de335a970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Establishment Clause and the Contraception Mandate Cases:

Comments

Post a comment