« Prum on Construction Lending for Green Buildings | Main | Map of the Day: Everybody Is Rooting for the 49ers »
January 29, 2013
Is a Seller Required to Disclose a Home's Bloody Past?
Yahoo! News picks up on a case bubbling up through the Pennsylvania courts:
A Pennsylvania woman has appealed to the state Supreme Court in her suit against a home seller and real estate agent who failed to disclose that a murder-suicide had taken place in the home she purchased.
When Janet Milliken, 59, moved from California after her husband died, she had hoped to start a new life with her two teenage children in Pennsylvania near her family. She bought a home in Thornton, Pa., for $610,000 in June 2007. She learned a few weeks after she moved in from a next-door neighbor that a murder-suicide had occurred the year before in her home.
She sued the seller and the real estate agent for fraud and misrepresentation, saying they made a "deliberate choice not to disclose the home's recent past," according to a court document. The trial judge granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, saying state law does not require agents to disclose such events.
Steve Clowney
January 29, 2013 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017d408b00c4970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is a Seller Required to Disclose a Home's Bloody Past?:

