October 25, 2012
Oberman on the Morality of Theft
Kieran Oberman (University College Dublin) has posted Is Theft Wrong? on SSRN. Here's the abstract:
Most people think that the actual distribution of property poorly reflects what people are morally entitled. Were wealth to be justly distributed, some people would have more than they currently possess; others, less. Theft is one means by which a more just distribution could be pursued. Those who currently have less than their due could take from those that have more. Yet most people also think that theft is wrong, even when it redistributes wealth in the direction of justice. This article investigates why. It examines three arguments against redistributive theft: that (1) it is illegal, (2) disruptive of legitimate expectations and (3) undemocratic. All three arguments are shown to fail. The conclusion the article reaches is a surprising one. Theft is not always wrong. In fact it seems to be justified whenever it is an effective, proportionate and necessary means to pursue distributive justice.
October 25, 2012 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Oberman on the Morality of Theft: