PropertyProf Blog

Editor: Stephen Clowney
Univ. of Kentucky College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Kuo on the Public Necessity Defense in Takings Law

KuoSusan Kuo (South Carolina) has posted Disaster Tradeoffs: The Doubtful Case for Public Necessity (Boston College Law Review) on SSRN.  Here's the abstract:

When government takes private property for a public purpose, the Fifth Amendment requires just compensation. However, courts have long recognized an exception to takings law for the destruction of private property when necessary to prevent a public disaster. In those circumstances, unless the state accepts an obligation to pay damages, individuals must bear their own losses.

This Article contends that the public necessity defense should be rejected. First, the tight timeframe and limited options typical in a disaster response threaten to obscure the crucial role of government in planning for disasters and mitigating vulnerability. Second, and more fundamental, the deliberate infliction of harm remains wrongful, even if all available alternatives are worse and the situation could not have been averted or ameliorated through proper advance planning. A just-compensation rule — whether instituted via statute or judicial reinterpretation of the Fifth Amendment’s Taking Clause — would preserve the government’s emergency powers while reaffirming the rule of law and advancing the interests of social justice.

Steve Clowney

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2012/10/kuo-on-the-public-necessity-defense-in-takings-law.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee4314b05970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kuo on the Public Necessity Defense in Takings Law:

Comments

Post a comment