PropertyProf Blog

Editor: Stephen Clowney
Univ. of Kentucky College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Land Use Planning v. Muddling Through

Sometimes planning scores an Olypmic-sized victroy, as this story from outside Washington, D.C. demonstrates:

Rockville and Gaithersburg are nearly identical in many ways, and usually get along. But they aren't happy with each other right now, as they fight over who will annex a property located in the narrow swath of unincorporated land between them. This fight shows how long-term planning works and why it is important.

The crux of their disagreement is that Gaithersburg wants to annex a piece of land near the Rockville border that Rockville has never annexed itself, but to which Rockville thinks it is entitled. [...] The State of Maryland requires incorporated cities to adopt a future expansion plan, showing areas that each city may want to annex in the future. The entire point of this requirement is to give cities the opportunity to show where their "unofficial" boundaries are, so that everyone can plan accordingly. And whether Rockville cares to admit it or not, they never made any kind of claim to the land in question until after Gaithersburg claimed it for itself,

Steve Clowney

(HT: Will Baude)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2012/08/land-use-planning-v-muddling-through.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017743fcaab6970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Land Use Planning v. Muddling Through:

Comments

Post a comment