PropertyProf Blog

Editor: Stephen Clowney
Univ. of Kentucky College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

The Number One Sign Your Land Use Controls Might be Too Restrictive. . .

. . . landlords can get away with charging a $40 application fee to anyone interested in renting an apartment.  In San Francisco, a very tight rental market has allowed landlords to milk thousands of dollars from desperate prospective tenants:

At a “nice” $3,500-per-month loft in the Mission, “80 people showed up for the open house,” said Ms. Lamas, 23, who recently began working at a tech company in SoMa. “And the landlord said to me that he’d gotten 250 applications.” The cost of applying was $40, so if the landlord wasn’t exaggerating, he grossed $10,000 in application fees.

Steve Clowney

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2011/12/the-number-one-sign-your-land-use-controls-might-be-too-restrictive-.html

Landlord-Tenant | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef015437e74dbf970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Number One Sign Your Land Use Controls Might be Too Restrictive. . .:

Comments

In such a competitive market like San Francisco you have to think that this propety manager/owner went a little overboard. Sure, props to him for making money, but in all fairness he could have had a cutoff point and said that he was no longer accepting applications? Maybe a waiting line for application submission and possibly just process 2 or 3 at a time?

Posted by: Clint Rowley | Jan 9, 2012 7:39:12 AM

Post a comment