PropertyProf Blog

Editor: Stephen Clowney
Univ. of Kentucky College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, August 19, 2011

Blumm on Johnson v. M’Intosh

Blumm Michael Blumm (Lewis & Clark) has posted Why Aboriginal Title is a Fee Simple Absolute (Lewis & Clark Law Review) on SSRN.  Here's the abstract:

The Supreme Court’s 1823 decision in Johnson v. M’Intosh is a foundation case in both Indian Law and American Property Law. But the case is one of the most misunderstood decisions in Anglo-American law. Often cited for the propositions of the plenary power of the U.S. Congress over Indian tribes and the uncompensated takings of Indian title lands, the Marshall Court decision actually is better interpreted to recognize that Indian tribes had fee simple absolute to their ancestral lands. This article explains why the "discovery doctrine” should have been interpreted to be a fee simple absolute subject to the federal government’s right of preemption. Had the doctrinel laid down by Johnson been properly interpreted, its national and international effects today would have been much less pernicious.

Steve Clowney

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2011/08/blumm-on-johnson-v-mintosh-.html

Recent Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef014e8ac27e03970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Blumm on Johnson v. M’Intosh :

Comments

Post a comment