Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Munzer and Raustiala on IP in Traditional Knowledge

Stephen R. Munzer and Kal Raustiala (UCLA) have posted The Uneasy Case for Intellectual Property Rights in Traditional Knowledge on SSRN.  Here's the abstract:

Should traditional knowledge - -the understanding or skill possessed by indigenous peoples pertaining to their culture and folklore and their use of native plants for medicinal purposes - receive protection as intellectual property? This Article examines nine major arguments from the moral, political and legal philosophy of property for intellectual property rights and contends that, as applied to traditional knowledge (TK), they justify at most a modest package of rights under domestic and international law. The arguments involve desert based on labor; firstness; stewardship; stability; moral right of the community; incentives to innovate; incentives to commercialize; unjust enrichment, misappropriation and restitution; and infringement and dilution. These arguments do, however, support “defensive” protection for TK: that is, halting the use of TK by nonindigenous actors in obtaining patents and copyrights. These arguments also support the dissemination of TK on the internet and via other digital media and the selective use of trademarks. The force of these conclusions resides in the importance of a vibrant public domain, and the absence of any plausible limiting principle that would allow more robust rights in TK for indigenous groups without permitting equally robust rights for nonindigenous groups.

Ben Barros

[Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in posting]

Intellectual Property, Recent Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Munzer and Raustiala on IP in Traditional Knowledge:


This I can't wait to read. Lot's of buzzwords being bandied about here. I'll read and report.

Posted by: gompers | May 13, 2009 9:12:54 AM

So far, a good one. Author seems to want to give in to the ubiquitous urge to give special treatment to the usual "protected classes", but concedes there aren't too many legal foundations for doing so.

Posted by: gompers | May 14, 2009 2:33:43 PM

Post a comment