Editor: Stephen ClowneyUniv. of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Sponsored by Wolters Kluwer
Monday, April 28, 2008
David T. Beito (Univ. of Alabama) and Ilya Somin (George Mason) have an interesting op-ed on the subject in the Orlando Sentinel.
[Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in posting]
Takings | Permalink
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Eminent Domain's Impact on Minorities:
It might be interesting to see if one of Somin's colleagues at Cato could supply him with the statistics on the benefits of "urban renewal" to the very minorities supposedly injured by eminent domain.
Look, eminent domain should scare the hell out of every libertarian, free-thinker, disposed to think the founders had good reason to fear oppressive, inter-meddling government (ok, all powerful government). In my opinion, that portion of the Fifth Amendment is THE great conundrum of the Constitution.
But we've been down this road so many times: is it better to wallow in generationally institutionalized poverty or permit regrowth and spur at least nominal economic development, thereby providing the poor (yet propertied) a better chance to improve their position?
It seems that the article is further promoting the polar view that any and all eminent domain actions ALWAYS hurt minorities.
If minorities are disproportionately injured by eminent domain, they also have the potential to disproportionately gain from it. I suspect that if minority developers were the parties on the other side of the eminent domain issue, there'd be a lot less academic debate about the matter.
So, having said all that, I myself remain perpetually suspicious of ANY governmental aggressiveness, regardless of the stated motivation.
Posted by: Sam Gompers | Apr 29, 2008 7:27:33 AM
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support PropertyProf Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.