Friday, January 12, 2007
I'm teaching real estate transactions in my Property II class, and today we covered Stambovsky v. Ackley, the famous haunted house case. I have to say that despite its fun facts, I don't find the case very useful. Sure, its discussion of caveat emptor is okay, but there are a lot of better cases out there on that point. Am I missing something?
[Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in posting]