PropertyProf Blog

Editor: Stephen Clowney
Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, January 8, 2007

Priest on Creating an American Property Law: Alienability and Its Limits in American History

I'm excited to see Claire Priest's important article, Creating An American Property Law;  Alienability and Its Limits in American History, in the December 2006 Harvard Law Review.  Here is Priest's abstract:

This article analyzes an issue central to the economic and political development of the early United States: laws protecting real property from the claims of creditors. Traditional English law, protecting inheritance, shielded a debtor's land from the reach of creditors in two respects. An individual's freehold interest in land was exempted from the claims of unsecured creditors both during life and in inheritance proceedings. In addition, even when land had been explicitly pledged as collateral in mortgage agreements, chancery court procedures imposed substantial costs on creditors using legal process to seize the land. American property law, however, emerged in the context of colonialism and the dynamics of the Atlantic economy. In 1732, to advance the economic interests of English merchants, Parliament enacted a sweeping statute, the Act for the More Easy Recovery of Debts in His Majesty's Plantations and Colonies in America, which required that real property, houses, and slaves be treated as legally equivalent to chattel property for the purpose of satisfying debts in all of the British colonies in America and the West Indies. This statute substantially dismantled the legal framework of the English inheritance system by giving unsecured creditors priority to a deceased�s land over heirs. The Act also required that the courts hold auctions to sell both slaves and real property to satisfy debts in most colonies. More broadly, this legal transformation likely led to greater commodification of real property, the expansion of slavery, and more capital for economic development. American landholders, however, were subjected to greater financial risk than would have been the case in the absence of the Act.

The full text is available from the Harvard Law Review website.  I hope to have a few thoughts on it later in the semester.

December 2006 was a great month for the history of property.  Dedicated propertyprof readers will recall that Rachel Godsil's terrific article on early twentieth century race nuisance cases appeared in the Michigan Law Review in December.  In fact, 2006 was a great year for the legal history of property, given Susanna Blumenthal's wills article, which also appeared in Harvard in 2006.

Alfred L. Brophy
Comments are held for approval, so they will not appear immediately.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2007/01/priest_on_creat.html

Recent Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83571587f69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Priest on Creating an American Property Law: Alienability and Its Limits in American History:

Comments

Post a comment