PropertyProf Blog

Editor: Stephen Clowney
Univ. of Kentucky College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, December 5, 2006

Supreme Court Arguments in K-12 School Cases

Today's NYT has an article (Court Reviews Race as Factor in School Plans) that begins:

By the time the Supreme Court finished hearing arguments on Monday on the student-assignment plans that two urban school systems use to maintain racial integration, the only question was how far the court would go in ruling such plans unconstitutional.

There seemed little prospect that either the Louisville, Ky., or Seattle plans would survive the hostile scrutiny of the court’s new majority. In each system, students are offered a choice of schools but can be denied admission based on their race if enrolling at a particular school would upset the racial balance.

At its most profound, the debate among the justices was over whether measures designed to maintain or achieve integration should be subjected to the same harsh scrutiny to which Brown v. Board of Education subjected the regime of official segregation. In the view of the conservative majority, the answer was yes.

Over at How Appealing, Howard Bashman has a series of links to articles discussing the case.

Rick Duncan

[Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in posting]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/property/2006/12/supreme_court_a.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d8353999dc53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court Arguments in K-12 School Cases:

Comments

Post a comment