December 31, 2006
Preservation Covenant at Carter's Grove Plantation
This morning's Seattle Times has this story about the sale of Carter's Grove Plantation near Williamsburg. It has closed because of declining attendance and is now going on the market. It will likely go into private hands. The story talks about other historic homes (like Robert E. Lee's boyhood home in Arlington), which have also recently gone into private hands.
Here's a sample from the article, about the debate over whether sale of historic homes helps preservation:
In an escalating debate, some preservation experts argue that the best way to save the nation's most precarious historic houses may be to sell them to those who can afford to restore them, or at least keep them up, as private residences. If you look around the country, this isn't a problem, it's the problem," said Douglas Horne, a preservation consultant who advised Williamsburg on its decision to sell Carter's Grove.
The article says that although the plantation "will be protected by easements to prohibit subdivision, there will be no requirement that Carter's Grove be open to the public." Sounds like the makings of a lesson in property class on the use of covenants and maybe the origins of a class on historic preservation.
More on Carter's Grove, including some stunning pictures, available here.
Alfred L. Brophy
Comments are held for approval, so they will not appear immediately.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Preservation Covenant at Carter's Grove Plantation:
I read the New York Times article about the proposed sale of Carter's Grove. It was very disturbing - really shocking. I hope there will be a grass roots movement that could save the property before it becomes a bad example in a class on historic preservation.
As for "declining attendance", a friend has tried to bring her daughter there for several years and the property was closed.
Posted by: Mary Frezzolini | Jan 2, 2007 2:33:49 PM
Great post! I am doing research on the Carter’s Grove for a paper that I am writing. I really don't see a problem with a historical place being sold to a private person especially since no one was going to visit there anymore anyways. As long as they don't plan to bulldoze it into a parking lot. If I had the money I would definitely try to buy a piece of history. Thanks so much for sharing.
Posted by: lauren | Apr 2, 2013 5:35:29 AM