PropertyProf Blog

Editor: Stephen Clowney
Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Ohio Supreme Court Prohibits Economic Development Takings

The Ohio Supreme Court decided the Norwood case today.  I'm on the road and haven't read the full opinion yet, but Ilya Somin has a detailed post on it at the VC.

Ben Barros

[Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in posting]

Recent Cases, Takings | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ohio Supreme Court Prohibits Economic Development Takings:


The NY TIMES article on the case can be found at:

Note a certain fact in the case: all but three of the 70 homeowners sold voluntarily and have already been bulldozed. The holdouts, actually, represent a good argument for eminent domain as a last resort. The Ohio supreme court has just said that 1 homeowner now has veto power over any area-wide redevelopment effort. I repeat my argument made on previous posts that without eminent domain as a last resort tool for redevelopment, there is no way to solve the holdout problem and it confers on each property owner a super-property-right to veto any neighborhood improvments.

Posted by: Kurt Paulsen | Jul 29, 2006 9:52:36 AM

Post a comment