Thursday, July 20, 2006
David A. Dana (Northwestern University School of Law) has posted The Law and Expressive Meaning of Condemning the Poor After Kelo on SSRN. Here's the abstract:
The Supreme Court's decision in the Kelo case has been widely criticized, and has ignited a firestorm of “reform” in the states. Twenty three state legislatures have passed reform statutes, and nineteen of these statutes have been signed into law. Reform legislation has been introduced in at least 13 other states. This Essay addresses the question of what message is sent by – what is the expressive meaning of – the Kelo-inspired reform movement. My argument is that, in substantial part, this reform movement privileges the stability of middle-class households relative to the stability of poor households, and in so doing, expresses the view that the interests and needs of poor households are relatively unimportant.
[Comments are held for approval, so there will be some delay in posting]