« IRS Lists Abuse of Nonprofits in Its "Dirty Dozen" Tax Scams List | Main | N. Carolina Legislature Debates Limiting Sales Tax Exemption for Some Charities »
April 27, 2009
RHIO's Get 501(c)(3) Status from IRS
After a two-year moratorium, the IRS has begun issuing favorable exemption determinations to Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIO's) like this one in rural California. RHIO's are a relatively new development in health care; according to this article, the organizations enable health care providers and community residents to conveniently share and access patients’ clinical data, such as a patient’s electronic health records (EHR) and may act as a central health data collection agency. The activities of a RHIO may also include education and research projects, as well as creating and operating secure communication systems that support the exchange of health information, data and studies.
Crucial to the sustainability of a RHIO is the ability to collect fees that accurately reflect the value that each stakeholder receives from participating.(9) To achieve this, RHIOs should consider as many different business models as possible, including service-fee models and transaction-fee models.
In short, RHIO's essentially are businesses in their operating models. The IRS apparently has not yet released the actual private rulings on RHIO's (at least, a Lexis search did not turn any up, and I haven't seen any listed in the usual places, such as the Exempt Organizations Tax Review's monthly review of EO rulings). It will be interesting to see how the IRS handled the commercial activity aspect of these organizations in its rulings.
JDC
April 27, 2009 in Federal – Executive | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01156f5f6634970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference RHIO's Get 501(c)(3) Status from IRS:
Comments
The reference to a tranaction fee model is a poor option for a RHIO. In short you'll penalize users for wanting to access care results for a patient. "not a good thing"
Posted by: Janet | Apr 27, 2009 12:37:36 PM
