M & A Law Prof Blog

Editor: Brian JM Quinn
Boston College Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

No fraud exception for Countrywide litigation

The Delaware Supreme Court just issued its opinion in response to a certified question posed to it by the Ninth Circuit in the Countrywide shareholder litigation.  The question posed to the court: 

Whether, under the “fraud exception” to Delaware’s continuous ownership rule, shareholder plaintiffs may maintain a derivative suit after a merger that divests them of their ownership interest in the corporation on whose behalf they sue by alleging that the merger at issue was necessitated by, and is inseparable from, the alleged fraud that is the subject of their derivative claims.

Short answer: No, affirming Lewis v Anderson.  While shareholders' direct claims survive the merger, deritivate claims are extinguished.  In answering the certified question, the Supreme Court takes the time to remind us all that dictum is, well, just dictum, not new law.

-bjmq

 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2013/09/no-fraud-exception-for-countrywide-litigation.html

Litigation | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef019aff518eff970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference No fraud exception for Countrywide litigation:

Comments

Post a comment