Monday, February 6, 2012
Marcus on Confis and Hostile Acquisitions
David Marcus at The Deal had an interesting piece over the weekend on the role of confidentiality agreements in the context of hostile acquisitions. He focuses on confidentiality agreements in the Vulcan/Martin Marietta transaction and the Westlake/Georgia Gulf transaction. It's a good read. Marcus also offers up the following chart from Dealogic:
I'm curious as to how Dealogic defines "successful" - I suppose that a deal that starts hostile and then ends up with a negotiated transaction is considered successful. That's one way to think about it. But that does an injustice to the power of the poison pill. I doubt there are any deals on this list of US targets where a hostile bidder has been successful over the continued protests of the target board with a pill in place.
-bjmq
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2012/02/marcus-on-confis-and-hostile-acquisitions.html
Another interesting statistic would be the number of hostile bids that resulted in the target being sold to a third party.
Posted by: anon | Feb 6, 2012 6:18:40 AM