August 30, 2011
From an H-P spokesman (via Reuters):
We prefer a spin-off as a separate company and the working hypotheses is that a spin-off will be in the best interests of HP's shareholders, customers and employees," a HP spokeswoman said. "However, we have to complete the diligence process and validate this assumption, including fully understanding the dis-synergies in separating the PSG business from HP.
Spin-offs are always interesting transactions - particularly since they are often used to disentangle a firm from an earlier mistake (e.g. TimeWarner's spin-off of AOL last year). The H-P spin-off of its personal systems group will be interesting because it looks like it's part of a strategy to bury H-P. Al Lewis at the WSJ previously weighed in how a spin-off might be value-destroying for H-P. I'm still wondering why they think this is a good idea. It seems like there may be many "dis-synergies".
August 30, 2011 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dis-synergies?: