« AALS Section on Transactional Law and Skills: Call for Proposals |
| 3M runs afoul of earnout »
June 16, 2011
Are fairness opinions useful?
Abstract: We analyze a direct product of the investment banking process: target firm valuations disclosed in the fairness opinions of negotiated mergers. On average, acquirer advisors exhibit a greater degree of positive valuation bias than do target advisors. Top-tier advisors produce more accurate valuations than lower-tier advisors, but valuation accuracy is unrelated to the contingency structure of advisory fees. The stock price reactions to merger announcements and to the public disclosure of fairness opinions are positively related to the difference between target firm valuations contained in the fairness opinion and the merger offer price. We conclude that investment banks produce information not previously available to market participants through the rendering of fairness opinions.
June 16, 2011 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Are fairness opinions useful?:
Post a comment