M & A Law Prof Blog

Editor: Brian JM Quinn
Boston College Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

When Revlon duties apply

Whenever I teach Revlon, I'll admit there is a tension.  On the one hand, it's very tempting to simply say that when we're in Revlon-land, boards are required to turn into "auctioneers" and take the highest price they can get.  On the other hand, that simple answer wouldn't be exactly correct.  Revlon duties - to the extent there are any - are more subtle than that.  Footnote 3 of Wells Fargo & Co. v. First Interstate Bancorp has a nice statement of what "Revlon duties" are:

What I take to be distinctive about this state of affairs [when “Revlon” duties apply] is three things principally. First, in this situation the board must seek to achieve greatest available current value; it may not, in effect, trade achievable current value for a prospect of greater future value, as it may normally do in the exercise of its good faith business judgment. Historically, one would say that courts would be slow to impose this limitation except in limited circumstances. See Robinson v. Pittsburgh Oil Refining Corp., Del.Ch., 126 A.2d 46 (1924). And indeed despite the fact that commentators tended to treat the Revlon case as revolutionary, recent cases have made clear that it did not deviate from this tradition very greatly. Second, when in this situation, a board's duty to be informed will require it to fully consider alternative transactions offered by any responsible buyer. Third, in part “Revlon duties” are not distinctive board duties at all, but a changed standard of judicial review. That is when “Revlon duties” are triggered a burden will shift to the directors and the court will undertake more active review of the traditional directorial duties of care and loyalty under a reasonableness standard. Paramount Communications v. QVC Network, Del.Supr., 637 A.2d 34 (1993).

Rather than create a special series of duties, Revlon falls within the established fiduciary duties of care that a board already has.  More than anything else, Revlon takes the discretion of timing out of the hands of the board, but still leaves them with plenty of decisions to make and evaluates those board decisions against a reasonableness standard.  

-bjmq

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2011/03/when-revlon-duties-apply.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0147e391e7df970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference When Revlon duties apply:

Comments

Hi Professor,

Having a bit of trouble figuring out when Revlon applies, the effect of deal protections under Revlon, and how it looks in an issue spotter analysis. Do you have any recommended reading? Thanks in advance.

Posted by: 3L | Dec 5, 2013 9:00:08 AM

I wish you had actually written about what the title suggested you would write about--that would have actually been helpful.

Posted by: Jack Black | Apr 29, 2014 8:48:34 AM

I know it's exam time, but the title of this post is "When Revlon duties apply", not "When do Revlon duties apply?"

Good luck with exams.

Posted by: bjmq | Apr 30, 2014 5:56:39 AM

Post a comment