M & A Law Prof Blog

Editor: Brian JM Quinn
Boston College Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Selectica NOL Pill Okay'd

The Delaware Supreme court handed down its opinion in Versata v Selectica.  You'll remember that Selectica amended its rights plan to protect its NOLs with a 4.99% trigger.  The pill was then triggered when Trilogy aggressively bought through the 4.99% limit knowing that it might trigger the pill.   Trilogy was looking to get into the courtroom apparently. The court upheld the board's adoption of the shareholder right plan with a 4.99% trigger, and the special committee's subsequent decision to deploy the pill to dilute Versata.

You can read the opinion here.  If you're looking for an overview of the issues at stake, Robert Miller at Villanova Law published a nice little piece a couple of months ago (NOL Pill Reloaded) that's worth reading.

Generally speaking, the court upheld the Chancery Court opinion. Consistent with past practice, the court held that the proper standard of review for challenged board actions taken to defend the corporation or a corporate policy is Unocal.  Applying Unocal, the court then largely concurred with Chancery's analysis.  Moving on ...

-bjmq

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2010/10/selectica-nol-pill-okayd.html

Takeover Defenses | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0133f4db783d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Selectica NOL Pill Okay'd:

Comments

Post a comment