M & A Law Prof Blog

Editor: Brian JM Quinn
Boston College Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Limits on Termination Fees

While Delaware does not take a brightline rule approach to limiting the size of termination fees, other do.  Last week, I referred to a paper from John Coates comparing Delaware's standards with respect to termination fees with the UK's rule-based approach.  Well, last week, the Takeovers Panel in Australia, the Takeover Panel's cousin down under adopted new guidance on termination fees (break fees), limiting their size in most circumstances to no more than 1% of equity value of a transaction. 

In its guidance on lock-up devices, the Panel also warned against the potentially anti-competitive effect of what they call no-due-diligence obligations, particularly those that provide initial bidders with information rights in the event a second bidder happens along.  I blogged about the potentially anti-competitive effects of this kind of weak-form rights of first refusal before.  Delaware, however, is clearly okay with them (see Toys R Us).

One supposes that the announcement of a brightline rule with respect to termination fees in Australia provides a nice opportunity for a natural experiment.


-bjmq

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2010/02/limits-on-termination-fees.html

Takeover Defenses | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a8cda06f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Limits on Termination Fees:

Comments

Post a comment