M & A Law Prof Blog

Editor: Brian JM Quinn
Boston College Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, September 14, 2009

Rakoff Rethinks Corporate Liability

 "It is not fair, first and foremost, because it does not comport with the most elementary notions of justice and morality, in that it proposes that the shareholders who were the victims of the Bank's alleged misconduct now pay the penalty for that misconduct." So says Judge Rakoff.

All this rethinking of M&A and corporate liability is making my dizzy.  Judge Rakoff is apparently outraged that shareholders would be asked to pay for the misconduct of the corporation.  He rejected BAC's settlement with the SEC today.  In part because, in effect, innocent shareholders are being forced to pay the fine.  One wonders how many shareholder class action lawsuits end up in front of Judge Rakoff.  Presumably not many.  

The Dealbook has kindly posted the order below:

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2009/09/judges-rejection-of-sec-bank-of-america-settlement.html

Cases | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a56dc046970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rakoff Rethinks Corporate Liability:

Comments

Post a comment