M & A Law Prof Blog

Editor: Brian JM Quinn
Boston College Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

SLM Agrees to Jan Trial

Well, I was wrong about SLM's strategy.  Here is a copy of SLM's letter to VC Strine sent this morning.  In SLM requests a January trial date.  I can't believe that Flowers et al.  will now disagree given Strine's statements on Monday.  See you in Delaware this winter . . . .

Final Addendum Thought:  Reading into all of this and making a number of leaps, I think SLM was likely being obstinante in the negotiations (or not negotiating in good faith).  Flowers took the opportunity to take the intiative (see the waivers here and here).  Clearly, the parties could have reached some agreement that would help SLM manage its business for the next 4-5 months.  That they didn't probably means that SLM was bluffing all along to get a fast on-the-record hearing because that would favor their position.  When it didn't work, they decided to cave and go with a trial.  Apparently, they have determined to live with the covenant restrictions and not force VC Strine to act based on his reading of the contract without other (parol) evidence.  That seems a little strange given Strine's somewhat favorable remarks at the hearing; but perhaps this is marketing to Strine's comments about such hearings. 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/mergers/2007/10/slm-agrees-to-j.html

Delaware, Material Adverse Change Clauses | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e54efdac168833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SLM Agrees to Jan Trial:

Comments

Post a comment