Media Law Prof Blog

Editor: Christine A. Corcos
Louisiana State Univ.

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Heald on Copyright Reversion to Authors: An Empirical Study of Reappearing Books

Paul Heald, University of Illinois College of Law, has published Copyright Reversion to Authors (and the Rosetta Effect): An Empirical Study of Reappearing Books. Here is the abstract.

Copyright keeps out-of-print books unavailable to the public, and commentators speculate that statutes transferring rights back to authors would provide incentives for the republication of books from unexploited back catalogs. This study compares the availability of books whose copyrights are eligible for statutory reversion under US law with books whose copyrights are still exercised by the original publisher. It finds that 17 USC § 203, which permits reversion to authors in year 35 after publication, and 17 USC § 304, which permits reversion 56 years after publication, significantly increase in-print status for important classes of books. Several reasons are offered as to why the § 203 effect seems stronger. The 2002 decision in Random House v. Rosetta Books, which worked a one-time de facto reversion of ebook rights to authors, has an even greater effect on in-print status than the statutory schemes.

Download the article from SSRN at the link.

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2017/12/heald-on-copyright-reversion-to-authors-an-empirical-study-of-reappearing-books.html

| Permalink