Media Law Prof Blog

Editor: Christine A. Corcos
Louisiana State Univ.

Thursday, April 13, 2017

Haupt on Professional Speech and the Content-Neutrality Trap @ColumbiaLaw

Claudia E. Haupt, Columbia University Law School and Yale University Information Society Project, is publishing Professional Speech and the Content-Neutrality Trap in volume 127 of the Yale Law Forum (2017). Here is the abstract.

The Eleventh Circuit’s en banc decision in Wollschlaeger v. Florida is remarkable for embracing content neutrality as a tenet of First Amendment doctrine in the realm of professional speech. A new form of aggressive content neutrality is on the rise in First Amendment jurisprudence. Reed v. Town of Gilbert, a seemingly innocuous case about a municipal sign ordinance, ushered in what may turn out to be a dramatic shift in the way courts employ content neutrality as a core principle of the First Amendment. But content neutrality should not be thought of as axiomatic across the First Amendment. This Essay illustrates the dangers of falling into the content-neutrality trap in the context of professional speech. Professional speech communicates the profession’s insights to the client for the purpose of providing professional advice. The value of professional advice critically depends on its content. The First Amendment therefore may not require regulation to be blind to the content of professional speech.

Download the article from SSRN at the link.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2017/04/haupt-on-professional-speech-and-the-content-neutrality-trap-columbialaw.html

| Permalink