Media Law Prof Blog

Editor: Christine A. Corcos
Louisiana State Univ.

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Truth, Truthfulness, Defamation, and the Civil and Common Law

Eric Descheemaeker, University of Edinburgh School of Law, is publishing Truth and Truthfulness in the Law of Defamation in Les apparences en droit civil (Lionel Smith ed.; Montreal, 2014). Here is the abstract.

This paper provides a comparative overview of two related, but analytically distinct, issues in the law of defamation. The first is whether the true character of a defamatory statement relieves the defendant from liability. On this issue, the civilian and common-law traditions have historically settled on two markedly different stances, the latter accepting the sufficiency of truth simpliciter while the former never did. Some of the reasons for this distinction are explored. Different is the issue of truthfulness, in the sense of belief in truth. Does it, and should it matter, that a defendant believed that what they said was true albeit (prima facie) defamatory? Should we distinguish on the basis of the ‘quality’ of the belief? This paper argues that reasonable truthfulness ought to be recognised as a defence in the law of defamation. De lege lata , the law has never come up with such a general principle, but observation suggests that it has in fact been beating about the bush for a long time, using other analytical tools. Besides, a number of recent developments internationally can be understood as attempts to get closer to the above position.

Download the essay from SSRN at the link.

 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2014/05/truth-truthfulness-defamation-and-the-civil-and-common-law.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01a511bc0ce1970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Truth, Truthfulness, Defamation, and the Civil and Common Law: