June 29, 2011
Electronic Games and the First Amendment
Thomas Rousse, Northwestern University, has published Electronic Games & the First Amendment, in volume 4 of the Northwestern Interdisciplinary Law Review (2011). Here is the abstract.
Prompted by the upcoming Supreme Court case Brown v. EMA (formerly Schwarzenegger v. EMA), this article explores the case history of electronic game censorship, the history of new media regulation, and how significant free speech theories can be applied to electronic games. In Brown v. EMA and similar cases, lawmakers have attempted to regulate electronic games based on their violent content, while earlier cases refused to consider electronic games as speech at all. This paper advocates a structuralist analysis of media, the expressive germ perspective, to determine which media should be considered speech. By focusing on the capabilities rather than the content of nascent media, courts can avoid misclassifying rightfully protected expression due to cultural prejudice or unfamiliarity with new media. Ultimately, this paper broadens the discussion raised by Brown v. EMA to interrogate our judiciary's failure to protect media in their formative stages and fulfill the anti-majoritarian goals of the First Amendment.
Download the article from SSRN at the link.
June 29, 2011 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Electronic Games and the First Amendment: